The Pioneer Anomaly

This anomaly appears to affect satellite probes of the outer solar system. Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 is leaving our solar system. As they do, are slowing more than expected. Scientists seem to be able to account for this slowdown, but note that any number of other things that may be present. It 's difficult to give an exact reason that you can not physically go out there and see for ourselves what has happened. I'm going to put forward a hypothesis based on my theory of gravity.

I do not think that gravity is caused by the curvature of the fabric of space-time as a forward by Albert Einstein. A brilliant man who has done more for the advancement of our knowledge of the universe, no less I believe it is wrong in this case. No, I did the math to support my hypothesis, just a concept. I find a problem, ponder, I read the current theories on the subject, and then try to formulate a response. I see in my mind and then write about it. I do not claim to be right. I think the most important tool for advancing our knowledge is to put the idea out there. Enough ideas are put out there, get the odds that one of them will be right. This is what I do and what I always did with my hypothesis of a "Nothing Universe" by time and gravity.

My guess is this severity. The matter is composed of two protons and electrons. Protons are positively charged, while electrons are negatively charged. This is called the field and all the objects are the compounds of this. This is the state of things in our universe macro. As such positive and negative particles interact with one another. Like charges repel and unlike charges attract. The neutrons make up the matter as well, but they are neutral particles and is not included in my model of gravity. All objects around us the gravity exert on each other. I have a gravitational force, the keyboard I'm typing on has a gravitational force, the chair I sit on, everything has a gravitational force. Why is this? Since all objects are composed of matter.

The matter is composed of particles that have a charge. This is the key to gravity. So that is my working hypothesis of the attractive force must be slightly stronger than the force of repulsion. Thus objects fall down instead of upwards. If the opposite were true objects would fall up instead of down. I believe that the same applies to the anti-matter. Since the charges are exchanged is easy to assume that physics is the same in an antimatter universe. The gravity is nothing but the magnetism of the macro scale. We are all familiar with magnets and how they work. Magnetism true is not as bad, but the main cause is the same. With magnetism is of all the molecules that create a magnetic field aligned with a north and a south pole.

The water is a polar molecule, because the oxygen pigs electrons from the proton of hydrogen. Thus, on one side is more positive and the other is more negative. This is the polar magnetism. The Earth's magnetic field is due to its iron core. Polar Magnetism. If I were to name the classes I list them as magnetism, magnetism aligned, polar magnetism, electro magnetism, gravity and magnetism. These are different circumstances in which the magnetism is manifested. The first three we are familiar and occur at this level, the earth. Besides this is gravity.

The Earth is a body composed of matter, but it is nothing more than a huge mass of protons and electrons localized. The same goes for the sun and any other object in the solar system. Each of these bodies feel any influence over great distances. The sun holds the earth and planets. Our solar system may be considered as a whole as well. Get far enough and can be considered as another pocket of matter localized. A region of space containing nothing but protons and neutrons. Since I suck at math I'll try to explain the equation. In order to obtain the gravitational interaction between two objects that we must add all the protons and electrons of an object. Do the same for the other and then take the difference. Then compare the severity of calculations known object A, do the same for object B. This should give us a relation between the number of particles in a given object vs. the gravitational difference between the two objects.

I think that the Pioneer anomaly can be explained by this model of gravity. As the satellites leave our solar system that are slowing down. The sun seems to be the only item you pay any attention, but there are many other objects in our solar system. Beyond our solar system is a vast expanse of nothing until the next nearest star or stars. What we have is a pocket of the satellites are subject to feel the influence of our solar system as a whole. So not only is gravity pulling on the satellites themselves. There is the sun, all planets and moons, and all other objects each composed of protons and electrons. The same applies to the satellites. As the satellites to get further and further, that slow down more and more unless the energy of their escape velocity is increased. The point is that you have an area of ​​protons and electrons that exert their influence on the satellites, which are nothing but protons and electrons.

Since the attractive force is slightly stronger than the force of repulsion, this adds up to a slight deviation of the expected rate of deceleration. When I say that the attractive force is slightly stronger than the repulsive force, I mean that 4 interactions are underway. Will have the protons of an object to attract the electrons of the other and at the same time reject the protons that object. And vice versa. I am unsure if this representation is correct or weather or not it is something total. Perhaps is the influence total of all the protons of an object vs. the other, and the sum total of all the electrons in an object against the other. The main idea to remove from this is that large pockets of particles feels the influence of the particles in another object at a distance.

Think of a land space shuttle leaving, he needs to escape velocity. It must overcome the force of attraction (gravity) to reach the orbit. I think this explains why gravity is a relatively weak force. One need not go far to reach a stable orbit above the earth. Even if the land is a large object. I also think it's because blacks holes of an event horizon is greater. The land has an event horizon, only a very small. An event horizon of blacks holes is proportional to the amount of matter contains the black hole.

The event horizon of a black hole is significant, because it truly represents a point of no return. A difference of gravity of the earth where there is just the right amount of energy needed to reverse the direction. In the event that the event horizon is a final point, its hard with other objects. How far is far enough away that the gravitational influence of an object is not perceived by another? As you approach an object that starts to fall more rapidly towards it. All this of course depends on the mass of an object as it relates to another. Small objects fall at constant rates, because the difference in mass between two objects is so great.

Earth's gravity dominates and dictates the rate. The same is true of any small object under the influence of a planet or a star. Things change on a planetary scale. Then it's all about who is more massive and the tug of war ensuing. The land is in a stable orbit with the other planets of our solar system. This could also explain why the planets seem to be farther from the sun. This may be a cycle and I'm going to write an article about this problem as well. One who proposes the idea that the planets you only get so far away from the sun before beginning the return trip. Our solar system exists in a gravitational balance.

I can not buy the fact that a fabric of space-time exists, and that becomes deformed from a planet sitting on it. Or the model 3 d where space is deformed because of matter occupying space in the tissue. I do not think there is no time, the concept of space-time is out the window. I still consider these ideas, but do not put much stock in them. In my mind the severity must be linked to the costs of the particles that make up the field of an object. There exists a relationship on a macro scale that must be further analyzed. The link between pockets of charged particles. The same forces that hold atoms together may be the same forces that determine how the planets, the stars in interacting galaxies, galaxies, and how to interact well. I believe that my hypothesis about gravity explains the Pioneer anomaly. Please read my articles on Gravity, and now in order to better understand the ideas I put forth in this Article .......